Fix issue with recent activity sorting
This commit is contained in:
parent
7fe84d7de5
commit
29919f981a
|
@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ import org.springframework.stereotype.Component;
|
|||
|
||||
import javax.transaction.Transactional;
|
||||
import java.io.IOException;
|
||||
import java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException;
|
||||
import java.util.*;
|
||||
import java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture;
|
||||
import java.util.stream.Collectors;
|
||||
|
@ -338,7 +339,7 @@ public class DashBoardManager {
|
|||
}/*);*/
|
||||
|
||||
//GK: Shuffle the deck otherwise we will summon the DMPodia when sorting with status
|
||||
int pos = -1;
|
||||
/*int pos = -1;
|
||||
for (int i = (recentActivityModels.size() / 2); i < recentActivityModels.size(); i++) {
|
||||
RecentActivityModel recentActivityModel = recentActivityModels.remove(i);
|
||||
while (pos < recentActivityModels.size()) {
|
||||
|
@ -348,7 +349,21 @@ public class DashBoardManager {
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
recentActivityModels.add(pos, recentActivityModel);
|
||||
}*/
|
||||
//GK: No one likes to play shuffle with the recent activities. So just re-sort them based on how they have been sorted already
|
||||
|
||||
recentActivityModels = recentActivityModels.stream().sorted((o1, o2) -> {
|
||||
try {
|
||||
String order = tableRequest.getOrderings().getFields().get(0).toCharArray()[0] + "";
|
||||
String field = tableRequest.getOrderings().getFields().get(0).substring(1);
|
||||
field = field.equals("label") ? "title" : field;
|
||||
field = field.substring(0, 1).toUpperCase() + field.substring(1);
|
||||
return (order.equals("+") ? 1 : -1 ) * ((Comparable)o1.getClass().getMethod("get" + field).invoke(o1)).compareTo(o2.getClass().getMethod("get" + field).invoke(o2));
|
||||
} catch (IllegalAccessException | NoSuchMethodException | InvocationTargetException e) {
|
||||
logger.error(e.getLocalizedMessage(), e);
|
||||
}
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}).collect(Collectors.toList());
|
||||
|
||||
//CompletableFuture.allOf(future).join();
|
||||
// CompletableFuture.allOf(dmps, datasets).join();
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue