I don't like the "Solution" title here.. maybe use "Solution/Algorithmic details" (I would keep the Solution part together with the second one if we just need to be aligned with the specification you have found)
@andreas.czerniak please take a look at the changes and the comments. let us know when you have a new version so that me and @claudio.atzori can take a second look.
Hm... Reading it again... Is that an old version of the text? I can see that part of the information is also present in the next section. Could you please clean this part?
There is also some overlap with the previous section... Can you please revise it accordingly?
Also the next part is weird... I would have it as a separate section titled "Aggregation process" and its heading should be formated in the same way as the rest of the headings on this page...
I would remove the part that mentions that they are "too large"... Should we describe this case in another, nicer way? @claudio.atzori ???
"which is used to generate the final OpenAIRE Research Graph, accessible from the OpenAIRE EXPLORE portal and the APIs."
"from 2018. And from entity registries" => "from 2018 onward, and from entity registries"
Hm... Reading it again... Is that an old version of the text? I can see that part of the information is also present in the next section. Could you please clean this part?
There is also some overlap with the previous section... Can you please revise it accordingly?
Also the next part is weird... I would have it as a separate section titled "Aggregation process" and its heading should be formated in the same way as the rest of the headings on this page...
@alessia.bardi and @claudio.atzori if you don't have any objection please approve the changes (I have already done this from my side) and then merge commit.
I think that for the time being we can go with the CC-BY/CC-0. In my opinion, the other discussion is orthogonal and this is not the place to make any decisions. If, at a later point, there is any…