Fixed bug on property type name representation
This commit is contained in:
parent
72ddb4718a
commit
502ba899f7
|
@ -310,9 +310,9 @@ public class PropertyTypeName {
|
|||
stringBuffer.append(",");
|
||||
}
|
||||
if(genericBaseType!=null) {
|
||||
stringBuffer.append(genericBaseType.toString());
|
||||
}else {
|
||||
stringBuffer.append(genericClassName);
|
||||
}else {
|
||||
stringBuffer.append(genericBaseType.toString());
|
||||
}
|
||||
stringBuffer.append(">");
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ import org.gcube.informationsystem.base.reference.properties.PropertyElement;
|
|||
import org.gcube.informationsystem.base.reference.relations.RelationElement;
|
||||
import org.gcube.informationsystem.types.TypeMapper;
|
||||
import org.gcube.informationsystem.types.reference.Type;
|
||||
import org.gcube.informationsystem.types.reference.properties.PropertyDefinition;
|
||||
import org.gcube.informationsystem.types.reference.properties.PropertyType;
|
||||
import org.gcube.informationsystem.utils.TypeVersion;
|
||||
import org.junit.Assert;
|
||||
|
@ -131,4 +132,19 @@ public class ISMDiscoveryTest {
|
|||
ElementSpecilizationDiscovery.manageISM(schemaAction , packages);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void testTypeDefinition() throws Exception {
|
||||
Class<? extends Element> clz = PropertyType.class;
|
||||
Type type = TypeMapper.createTypeDefinition(clz);
|
||||
Assert.assertTrue(type.getName().compareTo(PropertyType.NAME)==0);
|
||||
for(PropertyDefinition propertyDefinition : type.getProperties()) {
|
||||
if(propertyDefinition.getName().compareTo(PropertyType.PROPERTIES_PROPERTY)==0) {
|
||||
logger.debug("{}", propertyDefinition);
|
||||
Assert.assertTrue(propertyDefinition.getType().compareTo("Set<PropertyDefinition>")==0);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
String typeDefinitionJsonString = TypeMapper.serializeTypeDefinition(type);
|
||||
logger.debug(typeDefinitionJsonString);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue