diff --git a/src/app/pages/home/home.component.ts b/src/app/pages/home/home.component.ts
index 51a5a953f..d6f4c883a 100644
--- a/src/app/pages/home/home.component.ts
+++ b/src/app/pages/home/home.component.ts
@@ -1,7 +1,9 @@
import { Component, OnInit } from '@angular/core';
import { DataService } from '../../services/data.service';
-import {CountryOverviewData, EuropeData, SelectedCountry} from '../../domain/overview-map-data';
-import {DataHandlerService} from '../../services/data-handler.service';
+import { CountryOverviewData, EuropeData, SelectedCountry } from '../../domain/overview-map-data';
+import { DataHandlerService } from '../../services/data-handler.service';
+import { countries } from '../../domain/countries';
+import { Router } from '@angular/router';
@Component({
selector: 'app-home',
@@ -17,13 +19,21 @@ export class HomeComponent implements OnInit {
leadingOpenScienceData: CountryOverviewData[];
+ countriesCollection = countries;
+ keyword = 'name';
+
constructor(private dataService: DataService,
- private dataHandlerService: DataHandlerService) { }
+ private dataHandlerService: DataHandlerService,
+ private router: Router) { }
ngOnInit(): void {
window.scroll(0, 0);
+ // const searchIcon = document.getElementById('search-icon');
+ // const inputContainer = document.getElementsByClassName('input-container')[0];
+ // inputContainer.insertAdjacentElement('afterbegin', searchIcon);
+
this.dataService.getEuropeOverviewData().subscribe(
rawData => {
this.europeOverviewData = this.dataHandlerService.convertRawDataToEuropeOverviewData(rawData);
@@ -58,4 +68,20 @@ export class HomeComponent implements OnInit {
this.selectedCountry = null;
this.selectedCountryData = null;
}
+
+
+ selectCountryFromAutocompleteEvent(item) {
+ // do something with selected item
+ // console.log('country selected: ', item);
+ this.router.navigate([`/countryDashboard/${item.id}`]);
+ }
+
+ onChangeSearch(search: string) {
+ // fetch remote data from here
+ // And reassign the 'data' which is binded to 'data' property.
+ }
+
+ onFocused(e) {
+ // do something
+ }
}
diff --git a/src/app/pages/methodology/methodology.component.html b/src/app/pages/methodology/methodology.component.html
index 26eadfb73..5e5d2f91c 100644
--- a/src/app/pages/methodology/methodology.component.html
+++ b/src/app/pages/methodology/methodology.component.html
@@ -2,341 +2,346 @@
-
-
-
Introduction
-
-
-
-
- This document describes the methodology , terms, and definitions of the indicators presented in Open Science Observatory.
- The Open Science Observatory combines data gathered from OpenAIRE and other data sources to develop and operate an
- interactive and dynamic portal, which informs users via rich visualizations and reports on different Open Science
- aspects and facets in Europe. The Observatory is an extendable monitor portal with indicators on open science and
- the framework uptake by national and sectoral set.
-
-
- The dynamic Open Science Observatory leverages existing information collected by OpenAIRE and
- at little additional cost or effort, produces and reports value added metrics regarding Open Science
- trends and evolution for Horizon 2020 and other funding sources. The goal is to provide an EU Open Science Observatory
- as key OpenAIRE product, and employing open metrics based on open data gathered by OpenAire to measure the openness
- of publications and data on various aspects (e.g., gold/green/fair), the metadata completeness, the regional or
- thematic distributions and will test out preliminary metrics for their FAIRness. This will ensure that research can
- be evaluated at the right level (including article-level metrics and altmetrics), in an open and transparent
- manner. Such services will deliver accurate metrics for European Research and enable informed recommendations
- to high-level decision makers.
-
-
-
-
+
+
Coming soon....
-
-
-
Methodological Approach and Indicators
-
-
-
- Monitoring and evaluating the advancements, trends and impact of OS in Europe is recognised as one of the most
- important steps towards the realisation of the EOSC vision. The implementation of the Open Science Observatory
- follows the guidelines and
- methodological approach which was specified by the EOSCPilot project and more specifically the
- EOSCpilot Open Science Monitor Framework (EOSCpilot OSMF).
- It aimed to build a model and initial high-level specifications for providing useful analytics to researchers as well
- as enabling research performing and funding organizations within EOSC to monitor and gain insights about the OS movement,
- regardless of their service management systems and the technology behind them. The six core steps of the specified methodology are:
-
-
-
Step 1. Identification of the Open Science Activities;
-
Step 2. Policy-driven derivation of monitoring targets;
-
Step 3. Identification of the main Open Science Resources and Indicators;
-
Step 4. Design of monitoring processes, tasks and workflows;
-
Step 5. Modelling and implementation of the framework;
-
Step 6. Continuous validation of the monitoring targets;
-
+
+
+
-
- Step 1. Identification of the Open Science Activities: The first step addresses the need to identify
- which parts of the OS lifecycle are of interest in the monitoring process. These can include the conceptualization
- of a research task, the data and literature collection, the analysis and development of the research output, the
- publication, the review and evaluation of the research result as well as the reuse and reproducibility of results
- by the scientific community. These phases entail different open access practices and elements which are being considered
- by the monitor, with a special focus on the policies that these elements fall under.
-
-
- Step 2. Policy-driven derivation of monitoring targets: The proposed monitoring
- framework adopts a policy-driven approach for deriving high level objectives, i.e., target dimensions to be measured
- in the monitoring process. Policies on Open Access at different levels, such as the international, national and
- regional levels, as well as micro policies are considered as primary sources for deriving more concrete measurable
- targets (e.g., Openness, FAIRness, etc.) that should be monitored in the framework. Furthermore, monitoring targets
- can be organised into more specialised sub-targets, to measure more specific aspects of OS. For example, a policy
- recommendation stating that research data repositories should follow a data archiving plan indicates the monitoring
- target for long-term preservation of OS artefacts monitored by a set of indicators, such as whether an organization
- applies such a plan, or the period (e.g., months, years) for which preservation is guaranteed.
-
-
- Step 3. Identification of the main Open Science Resources and Indicators:
- In the next step, the monitoring targets are being mapped to OS elements they apply to, as well as to indicators
- that quantify these targets. OS elements are well-defined artefacts of OS practices, such as publication in open
- access journals, research data made available in open access repositories, open source software, open educational
- material, etc. In the context of this framework, these elements are called OS resources to state the importance
- of their contribution for the development of the “Open Science World”.
-
-
- Step 4. Design of monitoring processes, tasks and workflows: Each indicator
- must be associated with a set of processes, which are employed for the collection of data, the validation and
- scoring of metrics (e.g., combination and aggregation of metrics for deriving an accumulated score for a target
- dimension), the visualization of the results, and so on. These processes must be well documented in the form of
- workflows and tasks, to be performed for the collection and quantification of the indicators.
-
-
- Step 5. Modelling and implementation of the framework: The next step
- involves the detailed design, implementation, and customization of the framework, which includes the design of
- the functionality at its whole, as well as all added value services offered by the framework.
-
-
- Step 6. Continuous validation of the monitoring targets: The last step
- follows the operation of the OS monitoring framework and refers to the continuous validation and refinement of
- the monitoring methodology (i.e., targets and indicators) and results in EOSC. Α monitoring process, to be effective,
- must adapt to new OS practices and new policies, validating and readjusting its target goals as well as the indicators
- for their evaluation.
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
- The Open Science Observatory of the OpenAIRE is the first implementation of these specifications
- and it aspires to become a dynamic tool in the future, with benefits both to the organisations using it to measure
- the OA levels of implementation and impact to their community and for the High Level Stakeholders which are the
- European Union’s Legal Entities and Bodies, including the Member States and their respective Units. Gaps, implications
- and new ways of performing OS are among the elements that could be identified through OA Open Science Observatory
- which could then be easily incorporated within the stakeholders’ scope and strategic planning for OS.
-
The total number of open access publications currently in OpenAIRE, along with the percentage they represent with respect to the total number of publications.
+
+
-
Number of OA datasets
-
The total number of open access datasets currently in OpenAIRE, along with the percentage they represent with respect to the total number of datasets.
+
+
+
+
-
Number of OA repositories
-
The total number of open access repositories currently in OpenAIRE.
+
+
-
Number of OA journals
-
The total number of open access journals currently in OpenAIRE, along with the percentage they represent with respect to the total number of journals. Source: DOAJ.
+
+
+
-
Number of organizations with OA policies
-
The total number of organizations in OpenAIRE that have Open Access policies associated with them. Source: RoarMap.
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
-
-
Overview
-
Each table row refers to a country. For each country, the table shows total numbers of OA repositories,
- journals, policies, publications, datasets, software and other research products.
- The total numbers and percentages are computed as described in the continent overview.
-
-
+
+
-
-
-
Open Science
-
Open science related resources, specifically OA publications, datasets, software and other research products.
-
+
+
-
+
+
-
-
+
+
+
-
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
-
-
+
+
+
+
+
-
-
-
Country overview
-
-
Number of OA publications
-
The total number of open access publications currently in OpenAIRE for this country, along with the
- percentage they represent with respect to the total number of publications of this country.
+
-
Number of OA datasets
-
The total number of open access datasets currently in OpenAIRE for this country, along with the percentage
- they represent with respect to the total number of datasets of this country.
-
+
+
-
Number of OA repositories
-
The total number of open access repositories currently in OpenAIRE for this country.
+
+
-
Number of OA journals
-
The total number of open access journals currently in OpenAIRE for this country, along with the percentage
- they represent with respect to the total number of journals. Source: DOAJ.
+
+
+
-
Number of organizations with OA policies
-
The total number of organizations in OpenAIRE for this country that have Open Access policies associated
- with them. Source: RoarMap.
-
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
-
-
Info Box
-
-
R&D Expenditure
-
The total R&D expenditure for this country since 2008. Source: Eurostat.
+
+
+
+
-
Funding sources
-
+
+
-
Funding Organizations
-
+
+
+
-
Organizations funded by the European Commission since 2013
-
The total number of organizations in this country that have participated/participate in a project that was/is
- funded by the European Commission.
-
-
+
+
+
+
+
-
-
-
Green vs. Gold
-
-
Green vs Gold Publications
-
The line shows the evolution of the total number of publications that have been published through a green
- open access route, vs the total number of publications that have been published through a gold open access route.
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
Gold Open Access
-
The chart shows a ranking of the top 15 organizations of this country in descending order of their total
- count of gold open access publications.
+
+
-
Green Open Access
-
The chart shows a ranking of the top 15 organizations of this country in descending order of their total
- count of green open access publications.
-
-
+
+
-
-
-
EU Funded Open Science
-
-
Publications vs Datasets vs Software
-
The chart shows a per-year count and comparison of open access publications, datasets and software for this country.
+
+
+
+
+
-
Organizations
-
This table shows all organizations from this country, along with the total number of publications, datasets and
- software that have authors that are affiliated with each organization. The rows can be ordered by any of the three numbers.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
Repositories
-
This table shows all repositories from this country, along with the total number of publications, datasets
- and software that reside in each repository. The rows can be ordered by any of the three numbers.
-
-
+
+
+
-
-
-
Funding Sources
-
-
Publications vs Datasets vs Software
-
This chart shows colored horizontal bars representing total number of publications, datasets and software
- for each funder organization associated with this country.
-
-
+
+
+
+
+
-
-
-
Project Performance
-
-
Top 10 Projects by publications / datasets / software
-
A ranking of the top 10 projects in descending order of their associated publication/dataset/software count.
- Publication/dataset/software count is computed as the total number of publications/datasets/software that have
- been funded by a project.