aggregation section #2
|
@ -64,10 +64,10 @@ const sidebars = {
|
|||
label: "Aggregation",
|
||||
link: {type: 'doc', id: 'data-provision/aggregation/aggregation'},
|
||||
items: [
|
||||
{ type: 'doc', id: 'data-provision/aggregation/doiboost' },
|
||||
{ type: 'doc', id: 'data-provision/aggregation/doiboost', label: 'DOIBoost' },
|
||||
|
||||
{ type: 'doc', id: 'data-provision/aggregation/pubmed' },
|
||||
{ type: 'doc', id: 'data-provision/aggregation/datacite' },
|
||||
{ type: 'doc', id: 'data-provision/aggregation/ebi' },
|
||||
{ type: 'doc', id: 'data-provision/aggregation/ebi', label: 'EMBL-EBI' },
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Is it ok to use only "DOIBoost" here as the title of the item in the sidebar ? If yes, we add a "label" here.
Thanks for the hint. I'm not sure what would be better for the end user reading this doc. On one end DOIBoost means nothing, hence I'm tempted to leave the longer title (listing the different providers), on the other hand, aestetically speaking I surely prefer the short version.
It's good to know anyway that can build a cleaner TOC.