Restructuring data provision section #34
No reviewers
Labels
No Label
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
3 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: D-Net/openaire-graph-docs#34
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
No description provided.
Delete Branch "restructure_data_provision"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Continuing the work from here: #32
@claudio.atzori your input is required for:
Also, I have added sample text in the following:
Do you feel that extra content is required for those pages? Do you know if we have content for those processes somewhere?
I have also split the Post-cleaning process that we had into Cleaning and Finalisation, moving the vocaulary-based cleaning to the Cleaning page before deduplication.
Ok I'm going to provide a description asap.
As for the compatible-sources, IMO the text is sufficient. The crucial point is the link to the guidelines. More text is available in the upper section (/data-provision/aggregation/), I suppose the reader reaching the compatible sources section has already an understanding of the main concept, hence linking to the guidelines should be suffifient.
As for usage counts I can ask Dimitris, sure.
Thanks fine for now, thanks.
@dimitris.pierrakos do you think you can contribute to this section? Do you think there would more to add?
@schatz I added a text for the merging by id phase, while @dimitris.pierrakos provided an extension of the text for the usage statistics indicators, please check.
WIP: Restructuring data provision sectionto Restructuring data provision sectionOK it also seems fine to me. @claudio.atzori Do you think that we have to add a page about "Stats analysis" as well?
Given that we got a box in the diagram, we should have one, yes. However, I'm not the best person to write it. At this point however, I'll try to produce some text that someone from the monitor team could expand at a later stage.
Thanks Claudio. Maybe Antonis is the right guy for this? I mean for the second phase.
I'd opt for Antonis, Ioanna or Dimitris.
@schatz @thanasis.vergoulis please have a look at the latest commits. I added a brief stats analysis section, rewording a bit the one we already had until some time ago. I guess for now it will be sufficient, then it can surely be expanded in some next release.
Looks good! Merged this, thanks!