Restructuring data provision section #34

Merged
schatz merged 5 commits from restructure_data_provision into main 2022-12-23 12:32:18 +01:00
Member

Continuing the work from here: #32

  • Add sample text in docs/data-provision/aggregation/compatible-sources.md
Continuing the work from here: https://code-repo.d4science.org/D-Net/openaire-graph-docs/pulls/32 - Add sample text in docs/data-provision/aggregation/compatible-sources.md
miriam.baglioni was assigned by schatz 2022-12-21 20:48:53 +01:00
claudio.atzori was assigned by schatz 2022-12-21 20:48:53 +01:00
thanasis.vergoulis was assigned by schatz 2022-12-21 20:48:53 +01:00
schatz added 1 commit 2022-12-21 20:48:53 +01:00
Author
Member

@claudio.atzori your input is required for:

  • /data-provision/merge-by-id

Also, I have added sample text in the following:

  • /data-provision/aggregation/compatible-sources
  • /data-provision/indicators-ingestion/usage-counts

Do you feel that extra content is required for those pages? Do you know if we have content for those processes somewhere?

I have also split the Post-cleaning process that we had into Cleaning and Finalisation, moving the vocaulary-based cleaning to the Cleaning page before deduplication.

@claudio.atzori your input is required for: - /data-provision/merge-by-id Also, I have added sample text in the following: - /data-provision/aggregation/compatible-sources - /data-provision/indicators-ingestion/usage-counts Do you feel that extra content is required for those pages? Do you know if we have content for those processes somewhere? I have also split the *Post-cleaning* process that we had into *Cleaning* and *Finalisation*, moving the vocaulary-based cleaning to the Cleaning page before deduplication.

@claudio.atzori your input is required for:

  • /data-provision/merge-by-id

Ok I'm going to provide a description asap.

Also, I have added sample text in the following:

  • /data-provision/aggregation/compatible-sources
  • /data-provision/indicators-ingestion/usage-counts

Do you feel that extra content is required for those pages?
Do you know if we have content for those processes somewhere?

As for the compatible-sources, IMO the text is sufficient. The crucial point is the link to the guidelines. More text is available in the upper section (/data-provision/aggregation/), I suppose the reader reaching the compatible sources section has already an understanding of the main concept, hence linking to the guidelines should be suffifient.

As for usage counts I can ask Dimitris, sure.

I have also split the Post-cleaning process that we had into Cleaning and Finalisation, moving the vocaulary-based cleaning to the Cleaning page before deduplication.

Thanks fine for now, thanks.

> @claudio.atzori your input is required for: > - /data-provision/merge-by-id Ok I'm going to provide a description asap. > Also, I have added sample text in the following: > - /data-provision/aggregation/compatible-sources > - /data-provision/indicators-ingestion/usage-counts > > Do you feel that extra content is required for those pages? > Do you know if we have content for those processes somewhere? As for the compatible-sources, IMO the text is sufficient. The crucial point is the link to the guidelines. More text is available in the upper section (/data-provision/aggregation/), I suppose the reader reaching the compatible sources section has already an understanding of the main concept, hence linking to the guidelines should be suffifient. As for usage counts I can ask Dimitris, sure. > I have also split the *Post-cleaning* process that we had into *Cleaning* and *Finalisation*, moving the vocaulary-based cleaning to the Cleaning page before deduplication. Thanks fine for now, thanks.

Also, I have added sample text in the following:

  • /data-provision/indicators-ingestion/usage-counts

Do you feel that extra content is required for those pages?
Do you know if we have content for those processes somewhere?

As for usage counts I can ask Dimitris, sure.

@dimitris.pierrakos do you think you can contribute to this section? Do you think there would more to add?

> > Also, I have added sample text in the following: > > - /data-provision/indicators-ingestion/usage-counts > > > > Do you feel that extra content is required for those pages? > > Do you know if we have content for those processes somewhere? > > As for usage counts I can ask Dimitris, sure. @dimitris.pierrakos do you think you can contribute to this section? Do you think there would more to add?
claudio.atzori added 1 commit 2022-12-22 16:21:06 +01:00
claudio.atzori added 1 commit 2022-12-22 16:25:29 +01:00

@schatz I added a text for the merging by id phase, while @dimitris.pierrakos provided an extension of the text for the usage statistics indicators, please check.

@schatz I added a text for the merging by id phase, while @dimitris.pierrakos provided an extension of the text for the usage statistics indicators, please check.
schatz changed title from WIP: Restructuring data provision section to Restructuring data provision section 2022-12-22 16:39:32 +01:00
Author
Member

OK it also seems fine to me. @claudio.atzori Do you think that we have to add a page about "Stats analysis" as well?

OK it also seems fine to me. @claudio.atzori Do you think that we have to add a page about "Stats analysis" as well?

OK it also seems fine to me. @claudio.atzori Do you think that we have to add a page about "Stats analysis" as well?

Given that we got a box in the diagram, we should have one, yes. However, I'm not the best person to write it. At this point however, I'll try to produce some text that someone from the monitor team could expand at a later stage.

> OK it also seems fine to me. @claudio.atzori Do you think that we have to add a page about "Stats analysis" as well? Given that we got a box in the diagram, we should have one, yes. However, I'm not the best person to write it. At this point however, I'll try to produce some text that someone from the monitor team could expand at a later stage.
Collaborator

Thanks Claudio. Maybe Antonis is the right guy for this? I mean for the second phase.

Thanks Claudio. Maybe Antonis is the right guy for this? I mean for the second phase.

I'd opt for Antonis, Ioanna or Dimitris.

I'd opt for Antonis, Ioanna or Dimitris.
claudio.atzori added 2 commits 2022-12-23 12:13:49 +01:00

@schatz @thanasis.vergoulis please have a look at the latest commits. I added a brief stats analysis section, rewording a bit the one we already had until some time ago. I guess for now it will be sufficient, then it can surely be expanded in some next release.

@schatz @thanasis.vergoulis please have a look at the latest commits. I added a brief stats analysis section, rewording a bit the one we already had until some time ago. I guess for now it will be sufficient, then it can surely be expanded in some next release.
schatz merged commit 0e7b14c0af into main 2022-12-23 12:32:18 +01:00
Author
Member

Looks good! Merged this, thanks!

Looks good! Merged this, thanks!
Sign in to join this conversation.
No reviewers
No Label
No Milestone
No project
3 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: D-Net/openaire-graph-docs#34
No description provided.