add note harvesting range, respect IETFdraft rateLimit #140

Closed
andreas.czerniak wants to merge 2 commits from stable_ids into stable_ids
Collaborator

ZENODO has implemented the RateLimit HTTP Header response which is described in https://ietf-wg-httpapi.github.io/ratelimit-headers/draft-ietf-httpapi-ratelimit-headers.html and together with Retry-After (RFC 7231) , the HTTP request will be delyed.

ZENODO has implemented the RateLimit HTTP Header response which is described in https://ietf-wg-httpapi.github.io/ratelimit-headers/draft-ietf-httpapi-ratelimit-headers.html and together with Retry-After ([RFC 7231](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7231)) , the HTTP request will be delyed.
andreas.czerniak added 1 commit 3 years ago
andreas.czerniak added 1 commit 3 years ago
claudio.atzori changed target branch from stable_ids to beta 3 years ago
claudio.atzori changed target branch from beta to stable_ids 3 years ago
Owner

The stable_ids branch is now superseeded by the beta branch. In fact we're following now a different branching model: every change [*] should be presented to the beta branch for testing in the beta environment, then once tested, the code get promoted to the master branch to be run in production.

[*] of course this is a general rule and it is not cast in the stone. A bug affecting the code in the master branch can be fixed directly there without needing to go through beta first, especially if urgent.

Anyway, I manually integrated this contribution on the beta branch with this commit: 663b1556d7

The `stable_ids` branch is now superseeded by the `beta` branch. In fact we're following now a different branching model: every change [\*] should be presented to the `beta` branch for testing in the beta environment, then once tested, the code get promoted to the master branch to be run in production. [\*] of course this is a general rule and it is not cast in the stone. A bug affecting the code in the master branch can be fixed directly there without needing to go through beta first, especially if urgent. Anyway, I manually integrated this contribution on the `beta` branch with this commit: 663b1556d7adc0b9f8a94f75d99c299e216b08a1
claudio.atzori closed this pull request 3 years ago
Poster
Collaborator

Dear @claudio.atzori ,

nice to see you back from your vacation, hope all is good and healthy.
Please share those information about changing in handling of branches not only thru PR comments ;)

Dear @claudio.atzori , nice to see you back from your vacation, hope all is good and healthy. Please share those information about changing in handling of branches not only thru PR comments ;)
This pull request cannot be reopened because the branch was deleted.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No reviewers
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
2 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: D-Net/dnet-hadoop#140
Loading…
There is no content yet.