Merge pull request '[Graph Dump] fixed issue on extraction of relation between entities and contexts: the relationship name and type were swapped' (#176) from dump into beta
Reviewed-on: #176
This commit is contained in:
commit
5c4fee3533
|
@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ public class Extractor implements Serializable {
|
|||
value.getId(), contextId,
|
||||
Constants.RESULT_ENTITY,
|
||||
Constants.CONTEXT_ENTITY,
|
||||
ModelConstants.RELATIONSHIP, ModelConstants.IS_RELATED_TO, provenance);
|
||||
ModelConstants.IS_RELATED_TO, ModelConstants.RELATIONSHIP, provenance);
|
||||
if (!hashCodes.contains(r.hashCode())) {
|
||||
relationList
|
||||
.add(r);
|
||||
|
@ -99,8 +99,8 @@ public class Extractor implements Serializable {
|
|||
contextId, value.getId(),
|
||||
Constants.CONTEXT_ENTITY,
|
||||
Constants.RESULT_ENTITY,
|
||||
ModelConstants.RELATIONSHIP,
|
||||
ModelConstants.IS_RELATED_TO, provenance);
|
||||
ModelConstants.IS_RELATED_TO,
|
||||
ModelConstants.RELATIONSHIP, provenance);
|
||||
if (!hashCodes.contains(r.hashCode())) {
|
||||
relationList
|
||||
.add(
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ import org.apache.commons.io.FileUtils;
|
|||
import org.apache.spark.SparkConf;
|
||||
import org.apache.spark.api.java.JavaRDD;
|
||||
import org.apache.spark.api.java.JavaSparkContext;
|
||||
import org.apache.spark.api.java.function.FilterFunction;
|
||||
import org.apache.spark.sql.Encoders;
|
||||
import org.apache.spark.sql.SparkSession;
|
||||
import org.junit.jupiter.api.*;
|
||||
|
@ -96,6 +97,76 @@ public class ExtractRelationFromEntityTest {
|
|||
9,
|
||||
verificationDataset.filter("source.id = '50|dedup_wf_001::15270b996fa8fd2fb5723daxab3685c3'").count());
|
||||
|
||||
Assertions
|
||||
.assertEquals(
|
||||
"IsRelatedTo", verificationDataset
|
||||
.filter((FilterFunction<Relation>) row -> row.getSource().getId().startsWith("00"))
|
||||
.collectAsList()
|
||||
.get(0)
|
||||
.getReltype()
|
||||
.getName());
|
||||
|
||||
Assertions
|
||||
.assertEquals(
|
||||
"relationship", verificationDataset
|
||||
.filter((FilterFunction<Relation>) row -> row.getSource().getId().startsWith("00"))
|
||||
.collectAsList()
|
||||
.get(0)
|
||||
.getReltype()
|
||||
.getType());
|
||||
|
||||
Assertions
|
||||
.assertEquals(
|
||||
"context", verificationDataset
|
||||
.filter((FilterFunction<Relation>) row -> row.getSource().getId().startsWith("00"))
|
||||
.collectAsList()
|
||||
.get(0)
|
||||
.getSource()
|
||||
.getType());
|
||||
|
||||
Assertions
|
||||
.assertEquals(
|
||||
"result", verificationDataset
|
||||
.filter((FilterFunction<Relation>) row -> row.getSource().getId().startsWith("00"))
|
||||
.collectAsList()
|
||||
.get(0)
|
||||
.getTarget()
|
||||
.getType());
|
||||
Assertions
|
||||
.assertEquals(
|
||||
"IsRelatedTo", verificationDataset
|
||||
.filter((FilterFunction<Relation>) row -> row.getTarget().getId().startsWith("00"))
|
||||
.collectAsList()
|
||||
.get(0)
|
||||
.getReltype()
|
||||
.getName());
|
||||
|
||||
Assertions
|
||||
.assertEquals(
|
||||
"relationship", verificationDataset
|
||||
.filter((FilterFunction<Relation>) row -> row.getTarget().getId().startsWith("00"))
|
||||
.collectAsList()
|
||||
.get(0)
|
||||
.getReltype()
|
||||
.getType());
|
||||
|
||||
Assertions
|
||||
.assertEquals(
|
||||
"context", verificationDataset
|
||||
.filter((FilterFunction<Relation>) row -> row.getTarget().getId().startsWith("00"))
|
||||
.collectAsList()
|
||||
.get(0)
|
||||
.getTarget()
|
||||
.getType());
|
||||
|
||||
Assertions
|
||||
.assertEquals(
|
||||
"result", verificationDataset
|
||||
.filter((FilterFunction<Relation>) row -> row.getTarget().getId().startsWith("00"))
|
||||
.collectAsList()
|
||||
.get(0)
|
||||
.getSource()
|
||||
.getType());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue